![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I feel sorry for you. You are either unable or unwilling to look beyond the
superficial aspects of AirVenture and look for those items which you are interested in. Don't. I don't feel like I'm missing anything and I've managed to find other sources of information to feed my homebuilding desires. It's just kind of sad that Airventure isn't the airplane builders "overload" that Oshkosh was. It was nice after a week to go home exhausted from "too many homebuilts, too little time". The forums are still great but as for the homebuilts, sure there are lots of them there, but without the owners around to talk to or being able to get close you might as well look at the pretty pictures in SA. Now, either deal with the change or isolate yourself in the past. I'm the last person to object to change - but only change for the better. I don't think Airventure is as good as Oshkosh. One way of dealing with change that you don't like is to let those in charge know that you don't like it - and why. If they choose not to alter their way of doing things so be it. Let them keep loosing money. He couldn't keep control of one organization and keep it on track (if that was ever the intent) so what is there to make me think this group isn't headed down the same track? It is a free world, you should start your own organization and show us how it should be done. If you are not willing to do that where do you come off being critical of those who are trying? This isn't criticism. It was/is a question. If it proves to be more in line with the old EAA I just might start supporting it. Fool me once - shame on you. Fool me twice........ I'm going to wait and see. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|