![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:48:51 -0800, Richard Riley
wrote in :: That's what the whole Access 5 program is about - being able to fly UAV's in the airspace *without* impacting other traffic. However, that is not what is occurring with regard to the UAV Mexico border patrol. In fact, to my knowledge, the UAV manufacturers have not yet demonstrated a synthetic vision system adequate to permit UAVs to comply with FAA see-and-avoid regulations. To move forward deploying UAVs in domestic airspace is, as a result of that failure, is irresponsible at best, if not negligent. And the federal government's complicity in bilking the American people of millions of dollars in UAV funding is a travesty and reveals the current lack of fiscal responsibility. The money is better spent putting more agents in the field and implementing effective deportation policies; that's where the problems are. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|