![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Earl Grieda" wrote in message link.net... Partly right, I'd say. What they hate is that someone can afford an airplane for a toy, just like the environazis hate those who can have an SUV for a toy. From what I have been able to determine from interacting with members of the local anti-airport crowd is the opposite. They, generally speaking, do not have any problem with how an individual spends their discretionary income. The problem arises when the "toy", along with its associated use, has a constant, repetitive, day-in and day-out negative effect on the lives of thousands of others who would normally be indifferant towards the activity. Doesn't explain the cases (just about every one) where they built homes near airports that already existed. I have seen again and again where our attitude in the aviation community is that everyone else in the world is wrong and we are right. In lieu of the above, it would be the case that our group is right. Right/wrong is NOT determined but the volume and shrillness of the tantrum thrown. Our attitude is that they need to adapt to us and our activities. As above. This attitude is perceived by the general public as selfish and arrogant. As above. As long as we continue with this attitude we will continue to lose airports, and general public support. We might win an occasional battle but will eventually lose the war. And we as a nation continue to slide (call it whimsically "politically correct") as we kowtow to one tantrum after another. A nation of brats will not survive. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|