A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Differences between automotive & airplane engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old February 15th 06, 03:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Differences between automotive & airplane engines

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:14:33 GMT, Ernest Christley
wrote:

Those caveats are the killer, aren't they? You CAN'T 'properly lean'
the average aircraft engine, because they have horribly designed intake
manifolds. The mixture isn't distributed evenly. So to get two of them
properly leaned, you have to send the other two down into detonation
territory. Not knowing who's on first, the best bet is to **** your
money away in wasted fuel out the exhaust pipe.


It gets worse. According to John Deakin who wrote a series of very
very interesting articles on AVWeb (still available by the way) about
how to properly lean an aircraft engine, it's not just useless but may
be harmful to the engine to attempt to lean below peak if you do not
have an EGR guage that reads all cylinders.

He had a chart that showed that "properly" leaned, that is leaned
according to the POH using rpm drop, you could very easily have one of
the cylinders reaching a redline cylinderhead temperature, while
others were safe.

That is, if you are above about 65% power. At or below 65% power, it
doesn't matter where you set the mixture, you won't be able to
overheat the engine.

He also advocated leaning even to the point of roughness, if you could
stand it and were at 65% power, saying that the roughness wouldn't
hurt anything and was just the result of relatively unbalanced
fuel/air charges in the cylinder combustion chamber. This is the kind
of thing you feel because the cylinders of the four cylinder 0-360's
are so big. Any unbalanced fuel charge results in substantially
different pressures inside the combustion chambers from one cylinder
to the other, which can result in a perceptably rough running engine.

Smaller displacement engines with more cylinders would be less
susceptible to this syndrome.

Adjusting the injectors such that they produce aproximately equal
fuel/air distribution within the combustion chambers allows the pilot
to lean to the point where the engine quits, without any roughness to
that point.

Corky Scott
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Newbie Qs on stalls and spins Ramapriya Piloting 72 November 23rd 04 04:05 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 October 2nd 03 03:07 AM
automotive parts on airplane engines Wallace Berry Home Built 15 September 28th 03 02:55 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 4 August 7th 03 05:12 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.