![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi John;
This is correct as far as I know anyway. Investigators concluded, and indeed what I saw personally confirm that during the final stage of the descent curve on the second plane at least, the airplane was being flown manually with the AP disengaged. The first plane might have been on AP as the flight path was within the cutout parameters, but even there, the educated guess is that Ata disengaged the AP for the final approach to the building. This was the general assumption based on the aircraft behavior, plus investigative results that indicated a common plan for the mission was in place for both "pilots" in both aircraft. Dudley Henriques "John Carrier" wrote in message ... "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news ![]() AUTOPILOT Not. Autopilot is great for basic straight and level. Maneuvering for a building collision would require hand flying the jet. R / John |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 1 | March 14th 06 12:44 AM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | sfb | Piloting | 121 | February 25th 06 03:07 AM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Miss L. Toe | Piloting | 11 | February 23rd 06 02:25 PM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 08:25 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |