Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to hundreds of
people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the government's version of
events "defies physics". The Feb 1st seminar can be viewed on Google
Video, or downloaded to your computer.


The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:

"I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at BYU
on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed evidence and
scientific arguments for the controlled demolition theory. In attendance
were faculty from Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering,
Electrical Engineering, Psychology, Geology, and Mathematics - and
perhaps other departments as I did not recognize all of the people
present. A local university and college were represented (BYU and Utah
Valley State College).

The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended only
when a university class needed the room. After presenting the material
summarized here, including actually looking at and discussing the
collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee disagreed (by hand-
vote) that further investigation of the WTC collapses was called for.
The next day, the dissenting professor said he had further thought about
it and now agreed that more investigation was needed."



Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding are
based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.

In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook, tin foil
hat, or any other childish terms. The people who understand his
scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed asshole headed like a
lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be. You people are pathetic.


You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes to
9/11.

The airplanes were flown by remote control. The events were for the
purpose of building public support to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. Some
of you will still deny this fact. If so, it will be because your thinking
process is too much filled with tin foil hat commments, and you're too
stupid and brainwashed to understand real evidence


So when Atta come over the ATC frequency on accident instead of the onboard
PA that was just all computer controlled? What about the people on the
planes who said that they seen the hijackers enter the cockpit while on the
phones to their families? I guess all this "data" doesn't fit into the grand
conspiracy that you have cooked up.

Let's see. Muslim terrorists hijack airliners and crash then into buildings
because they can't get away from the death cult of Islam OR the goobermint
faked it all to start an unpopular war where nothing has been gained. Gee
that is a toughy.

-------------------------------------------
DW