|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
February 24th 06, 07:01 AM
posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
|
|||
|
|||
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible
mrtravel wrote: TRUTH wrote: How many times do you need to have it explained to you that there was no need for any of them to be instrument trained ? Flying in clear skies does not require an instrument rating. Graham At 30,000 feet it does But they went lower, didn't they? Irrelevant. They didn't care about the FAA rules. At 30000 feet, do you think it would be possible to figure out where Manhattan is, on a clear day? If you spend some time looking at maps, it wouldn't be that difficult. Anyone can fly a jet by visual references alone when the weather's fine. Graham 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Miss L. Toe | Piloting | 11 | February 23rd 06 02:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 12 | February 22nd 06 10:09 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 08:25 PM |
| Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Scott M. Kozel | Piloting | 1 | February 22nd 06 03:38 AM |
Threaded Mode