A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old February 27th 06, 09:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.homebuilt,rec.aviation.student
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default lift, wings, and Bernuolli


Dylan Smith wrote:
On 2006-02-27, wrote:
In the real world airplanes have flown with pressure sensors
on the wings, confirming lift from the Bernojuli effect in actual
flight.


Bernoulli's equations and Newton's are not mutually exclusive or somehow
additive - they are just looking at different aspects of the same thing
and both explain 100% of lift.


I'm not sure what hyou mean by this. One supposes that Bernouli's
equaitons are derived using Newtoniam mechanics and the
ideal gas law (it has been a long time since I took fluid mechanics
but don't see that there is anything else to work with). For that
matter
the ideal gas law can (probably) be derived using Newtonian mechanics.

Is that what you meant?


This does NOT disprove the notion that there is localized downward
flow from some parts of the aircraft. However, there is no NET flow
of air down or up from airplane wings or helicopter blades. Otherwise,
ambient pressure at ground level would steadily increase as more
and more aircraft pushed the air down...


But this seems a bit irrelevant. When I go to and from work in my car,
there is no net movement by my car either, since when I get home I park
it in the same place. But in the discussion of whether my car got me to
work or not this is irrelevant. Either that or I'm paying for fuel and
merely imagining I go to work .


Precisely. Flow is irrelevent.

--

FF

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
GAO: Electronic Warfa Comprehensive Strategy Needed for Suppressing Enemy Mike Naval Aviation 0 December 27th 05 06:23 PM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.