![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd be interested in "go/no-go" opinions of others, based solely on the
following information ... "Naturally aspirated, carburated, light twin (C172 engines) - hasn't been flown for 3 weeks - at the conclusion of last flight was fueled to the max. Has since been observed to have fuel dripping from the right-hand engine nacelle. Has been checkd by engineer who has put it down to "full tanks + volume change due to temperature changes". No other information available. My initial thought was "why wouldn't the excess fuel get forced out through the tank vents, rather than through "something" within the engine bay. How many of you would / would not fly this aircraft based on the above info? (I appreciate that more info would be nice, but it's all I have available). Many thanks, Cheers, |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |