Would you fly this Aircraft?

Based on that, I would NOT fly the aircraft UNTIL I had
personally inspected it to see what was leaking and from
where. If the float valve was leaking, the fuel level would
rise and over-flow from the vent on the carb. That is an
easy fix. If a fuel line is leaking, it is also an easy
fix. If a crack is in the float bowl, you replace the carb,
also easy but more expensive.

What is the history of the airplane before and on the last
flight? Was is parked with the fuel valves OFF or ON?


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"C J Southern" wrote in message
...
| I'd be interested in "go/no-go" opinions of others, based
solely on the
| following information ...
|
| "Naturally aspirated, carburated, light twin (C172
engines) - hasn't been
| flown for 3 weeks - at the conclusion of last flight was
fueled to the max.
| Has since been observed to have fuel dripping from the
right-hand engine
| nacelle. Has been checkd by engineer who has put it down
to "full tanks +
| volume change due to temperature changes".
|
| No other information available.
|
| My initial thought was "why wouldn't the excess fuel get
forced out through
| the tank vents, rather than through "something" within the
engine bay.
|
| How many of you would / would not fly this aircraft based
on the above info?
|
| (I appreciate that more info would be nice, but it's all I
have available).
|
| Many thanks,
|
| Cheers,
|
|
|