A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Accidents - correlation and causation?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old March 20th 06, 12:52 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Accidents - correlation and causation?

Seen in Avweb's AvFlash:

[begin quote]
CRASH STATISTICS, FROM THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
According to the AP's research, pilots older than 50 were involved in
55.8 percent of accidents over a five-year period even though they
constitute only 36.8 percent of certificated pilots. And, apparently,
the
older a pilot gets, the greater the risk. Pilots between the ages of 50
and 59 had 26.4 percent of accidents, marginally higher than their
percentage of the pilot population, which is about 22.1 percent, but
those 60 and older had 23.6 percent of accidents even though they make
up
only 14.7 percent of certificated pilots. The research also determined
that those under 50 consistently had proportionately fewer accidents
throughout the five-year sample period. More...
[end quote]

The main article goes on to say that pretty much anything other than age
was not factored into the report.

I'm just wondering - yet another questionable analysis? (I have no axe
to grind, it's still a couple of decades until I'm considered 'an older
pilot')

In particular:
- In the set of pilots between 20 and 50, perhaps a larger proportion of
those pilots are professional pilots flying for the airlines, where
the accident rates are lower and 2-pilot crews are the norm.
- In the set of pilots aged 50 and over, perhaps many more flight hours
are being flown by this group in GA aircraft because (a) they have the
time and (b) they are more likely to have the money - since their time
and money are less likely to be soaked up by child-rearing.
- as AvWeb pointed out, perhaps older GA pilots (generally having more
money) are flying faster machinery that is more likely to result in a
fatality when the angle of arrival is too steep.

I'd like to see it normalised particularly for flight hours and limited
to GA pilots only before I could draw any conclusions at all for a study
such as this. I don't think it carries much weight at all.

--
Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ice meteors, climate, sceptics Brian Sandle General Aviation 43 February 24th 04 12:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.