![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seen in Avweb's AvFlash:
[begin quote] CRASH STATISTICS, FROM THE ASSOCIATED PRESS According to the AP's research, pilots older than 50 were involved in 55.8 percent of accidents over a five-year period even though they constitute only 36.8 percent of certificated pilots. And, apparently, the older a pilot gets, the greater the risk. Pilots between the ages of 50 and 59 had 26.4 percent of accidents, marginally higher than their percentage of the pilot population, which is about 22.1 percent, but those 60 and older had 23.6 percent of accidents even though they make up only 14.7 percent of certificated pilots. The research also determined that those under 50 consistently had proportionately fewer accidents throughout the five-year sample period. More... [end quote] The main article goes on to say that pretty much anything other than age was not factored into the report. I'm just wondering - yet another questionable analysis? (I have no axe to grind, it's still a couple of decades until I'm considered 'an older pilot') In particular: - In the set of pilots between 20 and 50, perhaps a larger proportion of those pilots are professional pilots flying for the airlines, where the accident rates are lower and 2-pilot crews are the norm. - In the set of pilots aged 50 and over, perhaps many more flight hours are being flown by this group in GA aircraft because (a) they have the time and (b) they are more likely to have the money - since their time and money are less likely to be soaked up by child-rearing. - as AvWeb pointed out, perhaps older GA pilots (generally having more money) are flying faster machinery that is more likely to result in a fatality when the angle of arrival is too steep. I'd like to see it normalised particularly for flight hours and limited to GA pilots only before I could draw any conclusions at all for a study such as this. I don't think it carries much weight at all. -- Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ice meteors, climate, sceptics | Brian Sandle | General Aviation | 43 | February 24th 04 12:27 AM |