![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George" wrote in message news:T71_f.915202$xm3.227305@attbi_s21... "Juergen Nieveler" wrote in message . .. "Joe Delphi" wrote: 223 mph ?? Does that number sound correct ? Why not? Shkval allegedly can reach 300 mph... Juergen Nieveler -- Open Windows and let the bugs in. But if they can't aim it, it means nothing. They say it can evade radar. Yeah, who's radar? They're radar is 1970s vintage. Ours? Highly unlikely. They make it sound like something special, but the fact is that the U.S. has supercavitating weapons already. They have nothing new here, nothing that can't be taken out during the first days of any air campaign. And all the while we can stand back at a distance and pound the hll of them. Iran is blowing smoke. The Iranians are claiming that the underwater rocket has a range of 10km, but there's not a chance in hell that an Iranian sub or ship will get within 10km's of a U.S. aircraft carrier. So basically the entire weapon is fundamentally flawed. It's only usefull against oil tankers and cruise ships but those could just as easily be taken out with normal torpedoes or even mines. *** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com *** *** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com *** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|