A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pulsar with a turbine?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old August 22nd 03, 05:13 AM
Badwater Bill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:42:44 -0500, "Gig Giacona"
wrote:

Is the Helicycle legit or is it another Mini-500. I was looking at the web
site and can't find a think about building methods or cost. At list DF said
how much the Mini cost.


I don't want to endorse it yet, but BJ Schram is the inventor of the
Scorpion and the Exec series helicopters. They have all lacked a lot
when compared to a certified helicopter like the Robinsons, in my
humble opinion and I would not get in any of them and fly higher than
I would want to fall.

But...B.J. Schram is a serious guy who is a real engineer and who does
real things. He's been working on this damn thing for a decade or
more. If any experimental is going to work right and be the safest
out there, my money's on the helicycle.

I have some concerns about the Solar turbine exploding and that there
may not be enough protection around the turbine vanes to protect the
pilot. It also burns a lot of fuel, so you have to carry much more to
make it work right. But, if it has the power and the safety, then
maybe it will work. Also, Solar, themselves will probably do what
they can to help B.J. in making it more reliable and more safe.

It's too early to tell. Helicopters are so complicated that I'm
reluctant to even speculate on this project. I thought the Mini-500
was a great ship the first time I saw it (and didn't know **** about
the mechanics of helicopters or time-life components). That
helicopter proved out to be an abysmal failure, killing many people.
Schram's might do the same thing. It might be easy to fly and fun,
but it might be something that wears out quickly as parts get out of
tolerance in only a few hours. I worry about it since the certified
helicopters require hundreds of millions of dollars to experiment with
and get approved.

In the end, personally speaking...my life is not worth 1 second in an
experimental helicopter. I will never fly in one or test fly one
again, no matter who approves it.

I even worry all the time in the Robinsons. They are just so complex
and so much can go wrong, if you survive a few thousand hours, you've
done real well.

I think, if you screw with any of them long enough (from jet rangers,
to MD-500's and especially experimentals), you'll get bit.


BWB







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
turbo video Peter Holm Aerobatics 13 September 29th 04 11:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.