![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
houstondan wrote:
my first airplane. cessna 172C. Congratulations, that's a great plane. Some friends of mine have one in a two-way partnership, I tried to buy in with them but they were happy with their partnership the way it was and didn't want to take on a third. So I am jealous of you. why a 172-c?? well, a couple of reasons. mechanical flaps (you pull a rod that's laying on the floor) Yup, that's definitely a big plus. and the 6 cylinder engine which, although it is 5-15 hp light of later models, is smooth music compared to the banging of the 4s. Yes, that engine is sweet and you won't miss the missing hp. (You might regret the extra cylinders at OH time though). The engine may be less powerful than a modern 172, but the plane is also lighter. I flew a 172C loaded just about to gross on a warm day out of a 2100 foot elevation airport and I thought the climb up to 7500 was kinda slow. Then a couple of months later I flew out of the same airport in a 160hp Warrior that was more lightly loaded, and its climb was nearly identical. I did a lot of research on this engine and one thing I learned was that it definitely is much happier on mogas (assuming you can get good clean mogas for it) so you should make an effort there. it is slow by most standards but i think i see 15/mpg which ain't that bad considering the advantage you get over cars on "direct route". i'm retired; i've got lots of time. When it's your own plane you aren't paying an hourly rental, so an extra 30-45 minutes on a flight doesn't bother you as much. IMO. i can see that i'm going to be needing a lot of money for gas. The 172C that I flew and tried to buy into had a fuel flow meter, and we were getting about 7 gph in leaned cruise. Ok, so it's kinda slow (I think 100kts) but like you said, reasonably efficient. Enjoy your bird! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My first lesson | Marco Rispoli | Aerobatics | 3 | May 17th 05 08:23 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | August 1st 03 07:27 AM |