![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric, from a pevious posting on r.a.s. I turned up the following:
Title of paper: Four and Five Point Glider Seat Harnesses - Static and Dynamic Tests Authors Dr Anthony M Segal, Lasham Gliding Society, UK Leslie P Neil, Senior Engineer Impact Protection, UK DERA Graham A Reece, Instrumentation Engineer, UK DERA Philip G Murtha, Impact Test Track Engineer, UK DERA (DERA = UK Defence Evaluation and Research Agency) This paper was presented to the gliding scientific organisation OSTIV during their meeting at Bayreuth, Germany, in August 1999 and no doubt will be available in full from OSTIV (OSTIV = Organisation Scientifique et Technique Internationale de Vol a Voile). The paper is 20 pages long but para 5b is worth quoting in full (QRF = Quick Release Fastening, that is, the harness release box):: "5 b) Observations After the Impact Test When a 5 point harness was being tested, both with the harness tight and with the harness slack, the lap straps remained in the correct position over the hip bones. The QRF also stayed in the correct position. When a 4 point harness was being tested, both with the harness tight and with the harness lose, the lap straps were seen to have moved up over the abdomen until they were jammed tightly under the lower rib margin. The QRF had moved upwards until it was in the epigastrium (the "pit of the stomach"). This is very serious, because severe, even fatal injury may be caused to the internal organs in the upper abdomen. This is considered to be the most important finding of the entire test. Following the impact test, with a 4 point harness, the shoulder straps were seen to be hanging loosely between the seat back and the pilot dummy's shoulders. This was due to the upward movement of the lap straps and the QRF." Finally, the conclusion includes the following words: "A 5-point harness is superior to a 4-point harness in an accident impact situation and also under conditions of negative-g. This is especially so if the harness is slack." It also goes on to say: "The 5th strap should be fitted to new gliders and be retro-fitted (where structurally feasible) to gliders in current use". -------- end of quotes -------- Hope this helps Ian Strachan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |