![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Sam Spade" wrote in message ... I doubt anyone knows whether he was using LOC or ILS minimuma. The NTSB doesn't even understand the concepts: "The ILS 36 has a minimum approach altitude of 376 feet above ground level (AGL). The cloud ceiling was at 500 feet AGL. After the accident, the ILS 36 was taken out of service to be tested. It was flight checked on December 24, 1997, with no anomalies found." What does "minimum approach alitude" refer to? It could only be an MDA. How do you conclude that? A decision altitude is a minimum approach altitude, too, in a broad use of a term that lacks any official definition. Besides, no one has any way of determining whether the pilot was flying the LOC or ILS profile. What does "376 feet above ground level" refer to? At the time of this accident 440 MSL was the MDA for the S-LOC 36, that's 376 feet above the TDZE of 64 feet. Yes, but "above ground level" is a term of ignorance. Above ground level at the crash site, at the runway, or at the DA point, or along the entire length of the final approach segment where the LOC DMA could resonably apply? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|