![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Perhaps I am not sufficiently clarifying the objective he it is to
enable P1 to fly the (N-reg) plane and log it, under actual IFR, without P2 being an instructor. If it is legal, what could P1 log it as? Surely he can't log instrument time unless P2 is a CFII? In the United States, it is legal. P1 (non instrument rated but otherwise current) P2 (instrument rated and current) To BE PIC, one must be current and rated for the aircraft and the conditions. To LOG PIC it is not necessary to BE PIC. One can BE PIC without being able to LOG PIC. Under the conditions noted (IMC, IFR), P1 cannot BE PIC. P2 can be PIC. Therefore, P2 must be PIC to make the flight legal. This (by itself) does not allow him to log PIC time. P2, as sole manipulator, can log PIC time, even though he is not PIC. == Now change the conditions slightly. VMC, IFR. P1 still cannot BE PIC. P2 is required to be PIC. If P1 (sole manipulator) is not wearing a hood, then no safety pilot is required, so P2 is not a required crew member. If P1 is under the hood, then a safety pilot is required. I am not clear on whether this is sufficient (as in VMC, VFR) to allow both to log PIC, since the flight COULD NOT TAKE PLACE (legally) without P2's instrument rating, whereas the VMC, VFR flight COULD take place without P2's instrument rating. I'm inclined to think that both pilots could log PIC time in this case, and only P2 could BE PIC. VMC, VFR, with nobody under the hood - No safety pilot is required. The sole manipulator gets to log PIC time. Either pilot may BE PIC, but being PIC does not (by itself) allow one to log PIC time. VMC, VFR, with P1 under the hood. P2, the safety pilot, is a required crewmember. P1 (rated for the aircraft and conditions) MAY be PIC, but P2 may also be PIC. Treating these conditions separately: ....if P2 is PIC, he can also LOG PIC time as "pilot in command where more than one pilot is required". (this is specifically allowed in the regs and the "letters of clarification"). P1 (sole manipulator) may also log PIC time, so two pilots get to log PIC time even though only one is actually the PIC. ....if P2 is NOT PIC, then P1 MUST be PIC. He may log PIC time as sole manipulator, and also as "pilot in command where more than one pilot is required". (he doesn't get double hours though. In this case, P2 may choose to log SIC time, as a required crewmember. This is what I do (it's my only SIC time; although I have no interest in flying commercial jets, I have heard that those hiring like to see SIC time as it shows crew management experience). IMC, VFR. This is an illegal flight, and nobody should log anything. ![]() Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I want to ask you the most important question of your life. | Douglas Olson | Owning | 1 | May 22nd 05 06:15 AM |
| 182RG question | Paul Anton | Owning | 11 | May 16th 05 10:45 PM |
| Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 02:11 AM |
| Could the Press Grow a Spine? | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 259 | July 11th 04 09:35 PM |