![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
See more info at www.jaxairplane.com
None of us knew about the public hearings. I see hearings advertized in the Florida Times Union all the time. It is the local Jacksonville paper with a circulation of about 169,000. This was published twice in the Financial Times which none of us had even heard of. It has a circulation of about 5,500 and from what I know of it is the newspaper of the circuit court and is read by lawyers and politicians, not the average Jacksonville citizen. What their criteria is for which paper they publish something like this in is something I don't know. I do have fourteen audio tapes of two of the city council meetings I am sorting through to find the relative parts and I will be picking up two DVDs of meetings tomorrow. Dan Horton wrote: Milford or Brian, We do need information. First we have some information from the public record. Like any new ordinance, this one did not spring forth full grown. The ordinance started with a public reading at a City Council meeting on May 9th. From there it was referred to the zoning committee for their May 16th public hearing. It was read again at the next Council meeting (May 23rd), the floor was opened for public comment, and it was then rereferred back to zoning. The zoning committee held their next public hearing on June 6th. It then went back to the Council for the June 13th meeting, public comment was invited one last time, then the council members voted 16-aye. Six public hearings, plus multiple publishings in the local newspaper of record. It is clear that Brian's contest with the city was ongoing long before May. At least one source reports hearing the story from Brain at S&F, yet Milton infers (in the intial post of this thread) that the new ordinance was a surprise. He says "the whole thing was put togeather with the most obscure notification imaginable." Specific questions: Did Brian discuss any of his ongoing battle with his local peers, perhaps at chapter meetings, prior to May? (Recall that he had already "won" in court at least once, following a citation under older code.) If yes, did anyone pro-builder (Milford, Brian, Brian's attorney, local builders, EAA staff or attorney) attend any of the six public hearings? Dan Horton |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Bakersfield Municipal Airport May Be Sold To Developers | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 3 | November 23rd 05 03:00 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |