![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:16:27 GMT, Jose wrote in
: The operators probably have to eyeball the airspace over the 160 acres being photographed. [...] They ought to be able to see full-scale aircraft entering the airspace and command the UAV to descend or change course to avoid the traffic. How reliably can you eyeball 160 acres and see all aircraft in time to descend or change course? Sufficiently to avoid mid-airs. I fly RC about four or five miles away from Niagara Falls International Airport (IAG), which hosts a reserve air base on the other side. We get lots of planes of all sizes over or near our field. I don't think it would hard to see and avoid full-scale traffic approaching a 160-acre site. How often have you not seen traffic called out to you by ATC? Not applicable. The few hours I've spent in a Cessna 172 as a passenger are surely not enough to answer your question. How long does it take for you to find traffic in the pattern when you come in to a new airport to land? Do you find it all? Same reply. I'm speaking from hundreds of hours of watching RC planes and local air traffic from the ground. The operators will not want to have mid-airs any more than other pilots. If the operator has a midair, he gets a reprimand. If a pilot has a midair, he dies. The main burden of seeing and avoiding has to be on the ground operator. The odds of a pilot seeing a UAV of the size proposed for the aerial photography are miniscule--let alone recognizing it as a threat and avoiding it. Marty |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|