A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Weight-based User Fee Might Incentivize Smaller Planes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old July 30th 06, 02:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Weight-based User Fee Might Incentivize Smaller Planes



Those advocating Air Traffic Control user fees are revealed in this
document:


http://www.gao.gov/htext/d05333sp.html

National Airspace System:

Experts' Views on Improving the U.S. Air Traffic Control
Modernization Program

April 13, 2005.


The suggested initiatives included replacing taxes with user fees
based on the cost of air traffic services, allowing the ATO to
manage those fees, and giving the ATO borrowing and leasing
authority. The panelists advocating these kinds of initiatives
said the initiatives would help the ATO address the predicted
funding shortfall and free it from the constraints of the federal
budget process, as well as enable the ATO to pay for the technical
expertise and the technologies it needs to deliver efficient,
cost-effective service. In addition, these panelists said,
removing the ATO's funding from the appropriations process would
establish a direct relationship between the ATO and its customers
that could promote efficiencies and improve service. According to
these panelists, customers would monitor the ATO's spending to
ensure that the ATO addressed their priorities, and the ATO would
provide better service because it would try to please the
customers rather than the appropriators who now fund its
activities. Restructuring the financing of the modernization
program could streamline and strengthen the ATO's management, they
said. According to these panelists, this kind of financing
arrangement would allow program managers to make decisions
quickly, on the basis of business rather than political
considerations, and could provide the ATO with the management
tools needed to fully execute its mission. While not disagreeing
with the potential benefits of the proposed structural changes,
other panelists cautioned against investing too much effort in
them, since, in the view of these other panelists, the changes
were, for the most part, politically infeasible. Moreover, as one
panelist noted, even if the structural changes were implemented,
it would be important to consider what problems they were creating
as well as what problems they were addressing. He suggested,
for example, that a weight-based user fee might incentivize
smaller planes and more planes, thereby having the unintended
effect of increasing demands on the ATC system's capacity.
Finally, one panelist said, restructuring could resolve the
conflict of interest inherent in FAA's dual responsibility as the
regulator and the operator of air traffic services.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Should a W&B list gross weight? Andrew Gideon Owning 24 October 21st 05 11:03 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
more radial fans like fw190? jt Military Aviation 51 August 28th 04 04:22 AM
RV-7a baggage area David Smith Home Built 32 December 15th 03 04:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.