![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Those advocating Air Traffic Control user fees are revealed in this document: http://www.gao.gov/htext/d05333sp.html National Airspace System: Experts' Views on Improving the U.S. Air Traffic Control Modernization Program April 13, 2005. The suggested initiatives included replacing taxes with user fees based on the cost of air traffic services, allowing the ATO to manage those fees, and giving the ATO borrowing and leasing authority. The panelists advocating these kinds of initiatives said the initiatives would help the ATO address the predicted funding shortfall and free it from the constraints of the federal budget process, as well as enable the ATO to pay for the technical expertise and the technologies it needs to deliver efficient, cost-effective service. In addition, these panelists said, removing the ATO's funding from the appropriations process would establish a direct relationship between the ATO and its customers that could promote efficiencies and improve service. According to these panelists, customers would monitor the ATO's spending to ensure that the ATO addressed their priorities, and the ATO would provide better service because it would try to please the customers rather than the appropriators who now fund its activities. Restructuring the financing of the modernization program could streamline and strengthen the ATO's management, they said. According to these panelists, this kind of financing arrangement would allow program managers to make decisions quickly, on the basis of business rather than political considerations, and could provide the ATO with the management tools needed to fully execute its mission. While not disagreeing with the potential benefits of the proposed structural changes, other panelists cautioned against investing too much effort in them, since, in the view of these other panelists, the changes were, for the most part, politically infeasible. Moreover, as one panelist noted, even if the structural changes were implemented, it would be important to consider what problems they were creating as well as what problems they were addressing. He suggested, for example, that a weight-based user fee might incentivize smaller planes and more planes, thereby having the unintended effect of increasing demands on the ATC system's capacity. Finally, one panelist said, restructuring could resolve the conflict of interest inherent in FAA's dual responsibility as the regulator and the operator of air traffic services. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Should a W&B list gross weight? | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 24 | October 21st 05 11:03 PM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
RV-7a baggage area | David Smith | Home Built | 32 | December 15th 03 04:08 AM |