![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah, well. The 2-33 was designed back when Americans
were still pretty.* *Avg male weight 170lbs; avg. female 125. At 20:54 12 July 2006, Kirk.Stant wrote: Wow - a glider who's main attractions a 1. it's great to crash in 2. It'll fit you if you are anorexic and/or 16 3. It'll make you appreciate 'old school' aerodynamics and ergonomics 4. It's cheap, nasty, but available (wonder why?) If retro is your thing, then have at em and enjoy! And they are OK for rides (easy to get in and out of the front seat) and pumpkin drops (big opening side window in the back). But I think it is a shame to still be using 2-33s for training when there are so many better (and safer) alternatives. And I'm convinced that we lose a lot of new glider pilots after they get tired of wrestling the local club or FBO 2-33 around the sky for a few seasons. I guess the argument can be made that after a 2-33, any glider seems like glass - even a Blanik! And 500 hours in the darn things (mostly in the backseat, fortunately) hasn't done anything to change my opinion about them. 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
From the Jim Campbell, Captain Zoom archives (all of 6 years ago) | Mick | Home Built | 49 | February 3rd 06 03:27 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
A Sea Story (OT and long) | Mike Kanze | Naval Aviation | 4 | March 14th 05 03:51 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |