![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gilbert Smith wrote:
I manage an airstrip close to a CTR and close to the final approach path to the international airport inside the CTR. We have an agreement with the airspace authority which confines our flight paths to a safe area. A visiting pilot was given a transponder code and told to keep it selected on his departure scheduled for 15 minutes after landing, which he duly did. This caused a TCAS alert on a landing passenger jet. Our agreement now specifies transponders switched off (not even squawking standby) within 5 miles of our strip. Gilbert, could you give some more details. Particularly, is your strip in the UK? Is your agreement a local one with the airport, or is it with (or known to) the National Air Traffic or Regulatory body? On the general matter of aircraft location and proximity warning systems, radar is essentially a product of World War II technology whereas ADS-B is the future. ADS-B will provide air traffic controllers and pilots with much more accurate information that will help keep aircraft safely separated. Those words come not from me, but from the US FAA. As I understand it, ADS-B (Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast) is a system based on Satellite Navigation that automatically transmits GPS (or GLONASS or Galileo) position and other data from an aircraft to other receivers in ATC units and/or other aircraft. It is being tested by the USA FAA and also in Australia and certainly seems to be the system of the future. Here is an extract from the FAA Fact Sheet dated 2 May 2006 "ADS-B is the future of air traffic control. Instead of using radar data to keep aircraft at safe distances from one another, in the future, signals from Global Positioning Satellites will provide air traffic controllers and pilots with much more accurate information that will help keep aircraft safely separated in the sky and on runways. Although radar technology has advanced, it is essentially a product of 1940s World War II technology. Radar occasionally has problems discriminating airplanes from migratory birds and rain “clutter.†Secondary surveillance systems can determine what objects are because they interrogate transponders; however, both primary and secondary radars are very large structures that are expensive to deploy, need lots of maintenance, and require the agency to lease real estate to situate them. ADS-B, on the other hand, receives data directly rather than passively scanning for input like radars, so does not have a problem with clutter. ADS-B ground stations are inexpensive compared to radar, and are the size of mini refrigerators that essentially can go anywhere, so they minimize the required real estate. In addition, ADS-B updates once a second and locates aircraft with much more precision. ADS-B also provides greater coverage, since ADS-B ground stations are so much easier to place than radar. Remote areas where there is no radar can now have precise surveillance coverage." --------- end of FAA quote --------- So why are some Authorities trying to impose expensive and power-hungry transponders on people who fly mostly in unregulated airspace? Also, there are many types of aircraft that do not have electrical generators, such as gliders, hang gliders, para gliders and many motor gliders (turbos for instance). Surely, a future system based on Satellite Navigation would be much better all round. GPS is now being carried in most GA and many sport aircraft worldwide. A smart avionics engineer should be able to design a special low-powered transmitter that would take an NMEA or other output from existing GPS equipment and automatically transmit the data on (electronic) request. This could be a practical step towards the full ADS-B system of the future and would not involve the fitting of transponders to such classes of aircraft, Mode S or otherwise. It seems very similar to what is already part of ADS-B link technology, the Universal Access Transceiver (UAT), for which development (according to the FAA web site) started in the mid-1990s. Ian Strachan Lasham Gliding Centre, UK |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |