![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Nice summary of the PCAS models available. Airliners and some corporate jets have TCAS; they can "see" you without having to be told by ATC. Smaller motorized traffic likely does not have TCAS; they need to be in contact with ATC to know that your transponder-equipped glider is nearby. My choice was the tiny Zaon MRX. I use the rechargeable batteries recommended. This model gives relative altitude, altitude trend, and distance. Its beep beep is cheap cheap. It does not give azimuth information, but it has forced me to improve my good old-fashioned rubber-necking see-and-avoid procedure. One of the advantages of the MRX is that the alerts are audible; we already have too much heads-down technology in gliders to install more equipment that requires visual monitoring. When my MRX gives two beeps, I start looking everywhere (mine is set to beep twice for traffic within 1NM and 1,000 feet). When it advances to four beeps, I start looking everywhere with super motivation (mine is set to beep four times when traffic is less than 1NM horizontal and 700 feet vertical). Portability is an added advantage of the MRX. When doing introductory rides for our club, I take my MRX unit with me. The advantage of PCAS over the transponder is that you, the glider pilot, is alerted to all traffic with transponders. This includes Cessna 152s, corporate jets, commuters and large airliners. If all I had was a transponder, I would have to be in communication with ATC and under radar coverage to be available to be told about other traffic. Airliners with TCAS are able to see and react to transponder-equipped gliders. But the smaller powered aircraft cannot electronically see those same gliders unless those small powered aircraft are communicating with ATC (in a radar environment). PCAS (portable collision avoidance system) gives me more peace of mind. Given the choice between only some of them being able to see me, or me being able to see most of them, is the main reason I chose the MRX over a transponder. Last week, I had a couple of "two beep" alerts. Both of these aircraft came up from behind and below. But I was able to spot them sooner than when I did not have the MRX. Making transponders cheaper for gliders would be possible if the FAA relaxed some of its technical specifications. Since Santa Claus didn't show up with money, I can't have both a PCAS and a transponder, yet. Raul Boerner DM LS6-B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Collision Avoidance Systems | [email protected] | Products | 0 | May 21st 06 10:15 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |