![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ha? The Hawker TCAS would have not detect a mode c transponder on a
collision course at 16,000ft, even if in a gaggle and sqwawking 1200? (we sqwawk 0440 at this area though). Ramy jettester wrote: 5Z wrote: With all this discussion going on now, maybe someone with some knowledge or experience could enlighten us on the consequences of 10 or more sailplanes in a tight gaglge all squawking the same info. Will ATC see them all? Or will interference and/or filtering software at ATC make some or all of them invisible? Will TCAS be able to make sense of all these close together transponders? Remember, the typical application of the transponder is to separate traffic, so it is very unusual to have two (in our case 5, 10 or even 40) or more within 1,000' of each other. Can furrent technology deal with that, or will equipping all sailplanes create more problems than it solves? Thanks -Tom Tom; I am a FAA Test Pilot who is authorized to test Transponders in new aircraft... I do this for a living. I also was qualified as a Hawker 800XP test pilot. Bottom Line - Transponders are NOT the answer! Try putting one of these new LED Strobe Lights on the top of your Fin instead. #1. Transponders would not solve the mid air problem unless you were the only one in close proximity to the attacking aircraft. Typically, they set MTI (moving target indicator) to above 60K or higher (especially if near a large amount of highway ground traffic), so once you start thermalling they lose you unless you are given a discrete squawk other than 1200 (for non participating VFR Traffic) #2. If multiple gliders (or aircraft) are in the vicinity all squawking 1200, ATC could not tell one from the other. Mode C (if you have it) reports altitude, yet if the climb or descent rate is large (let's say greater than 1500fpm) their equipment typically faults you off the scope and does not report your altitude. Once again unless you are given a discrete squawk other than 1200 (VFR traffic). #3. If multiple gliders (or other aircraft) are in the same proximity on closing trajectories, the ATC system will issue warnings to the controller, that he must issue to the offending aircraft, to try to prevent them from colliding.... Unless you are in direct communication with ATC, they will probably get extremely miffed (read.. ask you to call them when you land, and they will probably find you!!) because they are spending more time trying to cancel these warnings to control other "participating" aircraft. #4. MODE S transponders have a discrete ID code embedded in the transponder that is supposed to be set to your aircraft registry ID (look on the FAA website for your aircraft registry information and you will find that ID for your aircraft). Mode S talks to other mode S equipped transponders, and is typically used to provide TCAS (Traffic Collision Avoidance System) information to issue the advisories to each aircraft. If you have this feature, and were to pullup rapidly with another mode S aircraft overhead, it could set off his traffic warning system. #5. I have flown in wave with a transponder equipped glider, yet I was talking with ATC and had clearance into the window. Always, conditions were VMC, even though operating in Class A airspace under an IFR Flight Plan. #6. Transponders are expensive... DO NOT solve the "see and avoid" problem.. can potentially really mess ATC up if you are not in direct contact with them.. and in the case of the Hawker midair..... would not have prevented the collision. Jettester (UP) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Batteries, Solar Panels, Transponders, etc. | JS | Soaring | 7 | August 31st 06 09:12 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
It was really close... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 166 | May 22nd 05 01:30 PM |
Pirep: Garmin GPSMAP 296 versus 295. (very long) | Jon Woellhaf | Piloting | 12 | September 4th 04 11:55 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |