![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think there is any future in joining or affilliating with either the
AOPA or the EAA. Now these are fine organizations to which I have belonged but the culture is very different from the soaring community and I am sure there would be issues that would not favor us. Associate yes, but remain distinct. Here's are three suggestions I think should be considered to revitalize the SSA organization. 1. Convert Soaring Magazine to a webzine to save about $300,000 a year. This would make the articles searchable thus creating a knowledge/culture base for all of us. Make the webzine open to all. 2. Relocate the headquarters to a city easilly reachable by a significant part of the membership. i.e. good airline connections with at least three active local clubs. This would mean that at any moment a rank and file member could walk in off the street creating a mindset in the paid staff that, "It would be harder to get away with something." It would also mean that a large number of vollunteers would be available if needed. Hobbs is a fine community but it is very isolated from the membership at large. I remember when the SSA headquarters was located in Santa Monica, California with a dozen or more local clubs from which help was available. It was, in my humble opinion, a much better organization then. 3. Create a study group of vollunteers to evaluate other national soaring clubs like the BGA and DAeC to see if there are features of these organizations that should be incorporated into a revitalized SSA. We need an SSA for the 21st Century. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|