![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marc, although I decided to stay out of this discussion (and any other
discussions on RAS), and ignore any pathetic comment from Al, I see the need to steer it to the right direction. I don't think it matters what Strepla or SeeYou reports which may indeed not be accurate, what matters is what you see when you plot the trace on a sectional. I am not familier with Strepla, but SeeYou has the option to download sectional maps, so you can clearly see if there is a violation. I would expect the SSA will use the same method. Ramy Marc Ramsey wrote: Doug Haluza wrote: No, you can't blame the software. You are the operator, you control the input and receive the output, and you have to check the results. This goes for any software, whether its SeeYou, StrePla, Quicken, Excel, Word, or whatever. I have to agree with Al on this one, I'm afraid. What is the SSA "official" source of SUA data and "official" software that will be used for detecting possible violations? Without that information, there is no way for anyone to be certain that they have either the correct input or output... Marc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial - StrePla Update | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | May 19th 04 02:52 PM |