A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The SSA-OLC



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #18  
Old September 28th 06, 02:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,691
Default The SSA-OLC

Hi Yuliy,

Congratulations on taking the fun out of the OLC. Congratulations on making
some very helpful volunteers very frustrated. Congratulations on
discouraging cross country flight.

I for one am a big fan of the OLC and I love to promote cross-country
flight.

I would not be in the least bit sorry if I never read any more postings from
you, but it is an open forum and I like that about it.

Paul Remde

"Yuliy Gerchikov" wrote in
message ...
KM,

Good points and observations,

"KM" wrote in message
ups.com...

I am new to the R.A.S


I too am new to the RAS (first post in 2001) and, according to some of the
loudest proponents of SSA-OLC, should not be allowed to state my opinions
here. But I'll venture some anyway ...before SSA takes over R.A.S and
turns it into SSA-RAS with its own policies and politics.

we have a active Yahoo group
where pilots post flights during the season.


Oh Horrors! You mean, you can post your flights, and no one will be
scrutinizing them for FAR violations? No one will be "guarding" the
community from the "bad apples"? No one will imply, without bothering
themselves with facts, that some pilots "consistently fly outside the
rules"? No one will tell you what you can or can't post there? No one will
tell you which flights you can or can't look at and learn from? Wow...
what a reckless concept. We haven't seen anything so disturbingly lax here
on OLC since the sanitation of traces started under SSA rule. Certainly
your Yahoo group is an unfortunate oversight on the SSA's part. Good thing
you have mentioned it here, so it can be looked at and fixed soon. What is
the URL?

This is not a contest, just
a way to report on the local happenings.


Aha! That must be it. Obviously, the reason SSA-OLC has to be so different
is the "C" in its name.

judging by the gist of
most of the comments on the "Sunset" thread the SSA OLC is not for
educational purposes, but much more of a hard core contest.


Here is the paradox. For educational purposes is, indeed, how most people
use OLC -- but those who own it now in the US insist on running it as a
hard core contest.

How did the SSA get a
monopoly on the OLC in the US,


Beats me!

and why did they change its intent?


Oh, this one is simple. Because they care about us -- what we say, what we
see, how we look to the feds. It's the Serve and Protect thing, you see.

Another thing I found during my research on the SSA website was a memo
regarding FARs.It started out with "The SSA is not out to interpret or
enforce FARs"


Interesting finding -- especially considering how easily some SSA
officials pronounce certain pilots and flights to be "in violation of
FARs".

Now let me state that I fly for a living, and I
have every motivation BOTH from a monitary standpoint and a safety
standpoint to follow the regs, but lets say my flight recorder does
something stupid and now I have the same outfit that I pay dues to
HELPING the FAA come after me?Bizarre


If you fly for a living, then you certainly, definitely, absolutely,
positively NEVER EVER want to post any flights that have ANY chance or
breaking ANY rules. Did you get it? Not even the slightest possibility of
violation. The rest of the flights you can post -- just make absolutely
sure that even with the ever-increasing level of scrutiny no one will ever
find (or suggest) and "report" any violations in them.

For example, you definitely don't want to post any ridge flights, because
most of them *provably* violate FAR 91.119(c) -- even though this
violation is not (yet?) in the SSA's "no-no list" and is inexplicably "OK"
for SSA-OLC. You also don't want to post any flights that look like
running the cloud streets (easily recognizable by high-speed flat "tops"
and little or no thermalling for extended periods of time), because
somebody may report you, alleging cloud clearance violations. For the same
reason do not post any wave flights on days when medium to high RH was
observed at your flight altitudes.

This list, of course, can go on and on, depending on how picky,
knowledgeable and motivated our volunteer "inspectors" are. Everything
else you can post ...well, *somewhat* confidently. If you feel lucky.

if a pilot were to post an ocasional short flight,
say 2 to 3 hundred miles about once a week, is he gonna get laughed at?


That's a new definition of "short" to me! In fact, posting "2 to 3
hundred miles about once a week" will put you high enough on the score
sheet to attract a lot of attention -- and scrutiny -- to your flights. So
keep in mind what you might not want to post.

is there a way to bypass the SSA-OLC (and forgo all the
politics and flaming), and just post to the OLC in Germany?


One would wish... Alas, there is no such way. The SSA, as you correctly
pointed above, has a monopoly on OLC in this country. Every flight flown
entirely within US borders must be submitted to SSA-OLC -- or not at all.

K. Urban

--
Yuliy



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.