Landing on a sloping runway with different wind velocities

"Edwin Johnson" wrote in message
. ..
On 2006-10-10, Edwin Johnson wrote:

Tony, in "Mountain Flying Bible" the author Sparky Imeson was once
discussing this and a physics professor handed him a formula which is
published in that book. It is the beakeven wind speed for taking off
uphill
into wind and downhill with a tailwind. Hopefully it formats correctly
here.
If wind is less, takeoff downhill and if more take off uphill.

Vbe = (s * d) / 5 * V

Whe
Vbe = breakeven speed in knots
s = slope up in degrees
d = POH distance to liftoff with 0 slope and 0 wind in feet
V = volocity of liftoff speed in knots TAS

OK Guys, there is supposed to be parentheses around the last two symbols,
as:

Vbe = (s * d) / (5 * V)

OK, if anyone is still following this thread with interest, I've
just done the calculation myself and come up with

Vbe = (s * d) / (7*V)

which is pretty much the same. For Vbe = V/2 it underestimates
by around 25%, being only truely accurate when Vbe V.

No idea what Sparky's assumptions were, but for mine,
I assumed that the acceleration during take-off is constant,
which seems reasonable with a constant speed prop and
ignoring the deceleration caused by the increase in parasitic
drag with velocity (which is assumed to be much less that the
acceleration the engine is giving).

Note that this isn't really what I was expecting -- I'd have thought
that wind would be more important. For my 182 on a
2degree grade on a hot summer day, I should take off
downhill only if the tailwind is less than 4 knots. Otherwise,
its best to take off uphill and into the wind. I'd really thought
the break-even point ought to be higher!

Now for *landing*, the calculation is likely to be more
involved. For a start, the deceleration profile is more complex.
One has the parasitic drag (proportional to square of airspeed),
and the deceleration due to brakes (which, when maximally
applied, are proportional to the weight of the plane as it is
transferred from the wings to the wheels). The former isn't
by any means negligible. The latter depends highly upon
pilot technique (how fast you can get the nose down) and
runway surface.

When I have a spare moment, I'll crunch the numbers on that too.