![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A practical purpose doesn't exist. It's only a feel good compromise to
settle the uninformed but very vocal critics while stopping short of closing the VFR corridors or banning flying under Class B shelves. I am repeatedly amazed at the ignorance of the uninformed aviation critics when it comes to the words "controlled" and "ATC". I am equally amazed when, after forcing a change in the name of safety, that these same people seem satisfied whether the change actually contributes to an increase in safety or not. They simply want their voices heard, their names in print, and their faces on TV... it makes them feel important and that they have accomplished something. They care little about the effectiveness or appropriateness of the change. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why would someone choose to fly VFR on top? | Ron Garret | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | November 6th 05 02:34 PM |
Dogfights: the Greatest Air Battles | Big John | Piloting | 0 | September 13th 05 03:05 PM |
TFR's Read Carefully | Ron Rosenfeld | Piloting | 2 | September 20th 04 06:12 PM |
air battles over normandy? | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 6 | January 22nd 04 03:17 AM |
Bush's Trip: 747 or C-17 Which would you Choose? | Leadfoot | Military Aviation | 38 | November 30th 03 04:03 PM |