![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had an interesting experience the other day. To some degree I was testing
the theory that a local Class-C facility would invariably vector VFR aircraft outside the lateral boundaries of their airspace. I've seen this at a few different airports where I transition through with flight following, but underneath (or overtop) the vertical limits. Basically, about 15 miles east I called up approach at 2500' westbound. I was going to fly underneath the class-C which extends 5-miles from the airport SFC to 5000', and 10-miles out from 3400-5000'. My on-course track would put me about 6 miles from the airport. Sure enough, they issued vectors and told me to stay outside 10 miles from the airport. I replied that I would stay outside the Class-C. They *again* issued me vectors and said to stay outside 10 miles. I reponded, "NXXXX would like to terminate radar services." I never received the "radar service terminated, squawk 1200," so I inquired as to whether or not they acknowledged my request to terminate. The controller replied, "I want you to stay with ME until west of the airport, continue on present heading." To which, I replied, "NXXXX outside the Charlie, 2500, on-course, as I was planning." I thought this particularly aggressive and unnecessary, so I was going to try to find the official regs as far as flight following goes. I'm convinced that's the reason why a lot of VFR pilots never want to talk to ATC unless absolutely necessary. I pretty much use flight following on any cross-country when I'm not IFR, but it aggravates me when they vector VFR traffic when outside (especially above/below) their airspace anyway. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA * * Electrical Engineering * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |