![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So it appears the pilot flew from Reno to San Francisco, to South Lake Tahoe, and on an additional 1-1/2+ hours to the impact site. There was no post crash fire... Does the SR22's CG shift much as a result of fuel burn? Would a glass wing be more prone to having large areas of leading edge ice break away all at once than one made of aluminum? On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:31:44 -0600, "mdwhitcomb" wrote in : http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...31X01585&key=1 Identification: LAX07FA021 14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation Accident occurred Wednesday, October 25, 2006 in Meadview, AZ Aircraft: Cirrus SR22, registration: N121LD Injuries: 4 Fatal. This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. On October 25, 2006, at 1208 mountain standard time, a Cirrus SR22, N121LD, reported icing conditions at 13,000 feet mean sea level (msl), disappeared from radar, and then impacted terrain about 24 nautical miles northeast of Meadview, Arizona. The pilot was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The instrument rated private pilot and three passengers sustained fatal injuries and the airplane was destroyed. A combination of visual and meteorological conditions prevailed along the route of flight and the airplane was being operated under an instrument flight rules (IFR) clearance. The pilot departed from Lake Tahoe Airport, South Lake Tahoe, California, about 1030 Pacific daylight time, and was destined for the Grand Canyon National Park Airport, Grand Canyon, Arizona. According to a family friend, the pilot met his wife and two children in the San Francisco area on October 23. On October 24, they flew to South Lake Tahoe where they spent the night. On October 25, the day of the accident, the pilot planned to fly to the Grand Canyon where he and his family would go hiking. The airplane was last refueled at a fixed base operator at the Reno/Tahoe International Airport, Reno, Nevada, on October 23. The fueling invoice indicated that the right and left fuel tanks were topped off with the addition of 24.1 gallons of fuel. On the invoice, the pilot's estimated departure time from the airport was noted as 1000 on October 24. A fixed base operator employee at Lake Tahoe Airport stated that the pilot arrived at the airport on October 24, from Reno. The airplane was secured to the ramp and no fueling services were provided. The pilot returned to the airport the following morning and found frost on the airplane. He and his family waited while the sun rose and melted the frost accumulation. They departed about 1030. The National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge, an Safety Board specialist from the Office of Research and Engineering, two Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspectors from the Las Vegas Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), and one investigator from FAA Aircraft Accident Investigation responded to the accident site on October 26, 2007. Additional investigative personnel from Cirrus Design Corporation, Ballistic Recovery Systems (BRS), AmSafe Aviation, and Teledyne Continental Motors, who were parties to the investigation, responded to the site to assist. The airplane impacted sloped desert terrain at an elevation of approximately 4,520 feet msl on a westerly heading. All of the flight control surfaces were attached or partially attached to the structure. There was no fire. The wreckage was generally confined to the impact area, and except for the area immediately surrounding the wreckage, minimal ground scarring was observed. The Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS) was examined. The parachute was out of its housing, draped over the empennage and aft fuselage section of the airframe. Some of the gores (panels that make up the canopy of the parachute) remained folded. The suspension lines were intact and undamaged. The deployment cable was continuous from the cockpit handle aft through the fuselage to the rocket housing area. The rocket and the deployment bag cover were located approximately 288 feet east of the accident site. Based on preliminary weather information obtained by a Safety Board meteorologist, local weather included AIRMETS (Airman's Meteorological Information) for icing (approximately 65 nautical miles northeast of the accident site) and moderate turbulence (within the accident site area). In addition, a convective SIGMET (Significant Meteorological Information) was issued for an area encompassing the accident site. A convective SIGMET implies severe or greater turbulence, severe icing, and low-level wind shear. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Aviation crash videos on-line | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 113 | September 12th 04 08:54 PM |
Aviation crash videos on-line | F.L. Whiteley | Military Aviation | 110 | September 9th 04 07:51 PM |
Crash involved veteran Navy airmen | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 2nd 03 10:49 PM |