![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve - KDMW wrote:
Is my company misguided or do they really have some liability if I use my airplane instead of my car for regional travel? What's the difference between me crashing my airplane into a school (their example) or plowing my car into the same school's bus stop? I believe what they are worried about is if you crashed into a house or something that other people would sue your company. It happens all the time and what they don't realize is that they are also just as easily sued if you ran into someone with your car. In this day and age people sue other people at the drop of a hat. A plane crash is just more 'spectacular' for a lawyer because they can play many angles (generally ignorance and envy) and end up with a much bigger pot o'gold. If it were me I'd just fly anyway, screw 'em. I hate driving. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
From the Jim Campbell, Captain Zoom archives (all of 6 years ago) | Mick | Home Built | 49 | February 3rd 06 03:27 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Calls Controller Whistleblowers "Rogue Employees!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 0 | March 31st 05 04:29 AM |