![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message ... So lets say I know my little RC plane takes off at exactly 25mph. So I crank up the treadmill to step up to 25mph so I can keep the RC plane up on the treadmill, the plane is completely stationary in regards to anyone standing next to the plane but when the treadmill hits 25mph and my little RC plane is staying even with the treadmill you are telling me I can pull back on the elevator stick and the plane will take off? I don't think so. The scenario you suggest is impossible. The RC plane will accelerate regardless of how fast the treadmill is running. Your "little RC plane" will NOT be "staying even with the treadmill". It will take off, just as it would from a normal runway surface. And it doesn't take a video of such an attempt to prove it. All it takes is a person who has a minimal education in physics and (key point here) is willing to listen until they understand, and someone else willing to explain it. You clearly fail to meet either the first or second criteria, or possibly both, since we do have the third criteria met here in the newsgroup. You are disrespectful of the various posters here who have made an honest effort to explain the situation to you and others. Man you are a dick. This has NOT been adequately explained or there would be no question about it. If the plane is not moving on the treadmill but rather keeping up with the speed that the treadmill is moving (yes planes DO have throttle controls) the thing is going to takeoff with no air moving over the wings? NO WAY. This is because you refuse to bother to read the wealth of information on the topic that already exists. Until you have done so, it would be a waste of time for anyone to bother responding to any more of your assertions or questions. I know that I won't. Pete Thank God for that, because you are a prick. Oh yeah, *PLONK*! ------------------------------------------- DW |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |