![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Darkwing" theducksmailATyahoo.com wrote in message
... "John T" wrote in message ... "Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in message First, the question posed in the link by the OP of this thread is an incorrect variation of the original. The original problem asks: "A plane is standing on a giant treadmill. The plane moves in one direction, while the treadmill moves in the opposite direction and at the same speed as the plane. Can the plane take off?" As has been explained, placing a car on the question's treadmill would result in a stationary vehicle relative to the observer standing beside the treadmill. The reason is the car derives its propulsion through the wheels sitting on the treadmill and the speed of the car is measured by how fast the wheels are turning. The faster the wheels turn, the "faster" the car moves. However, this is only relative to the treadmill belt. To the observer standing beside the treadmill, the car is motionless. If the driver placed his hand out the window, he would feel no wind even though his "speed" as indicated by the speedometer may be 100 miles per hour. Hmm. That presumes that "at the same speed as the plane" means "as fast as necessary to cancel the forward motion." If you take your car analogy and apply it to the plane, then the treadmill must try to run backwards as fast as necessary to cancel forward motion - which is, Ah, let's just say difficult. To be consistent with your conclusions about the plane's motion, then the car would also move. Using the object's motion as the defining parameter to determine the treadmill speed, then a stable state can be reached with either 1) a plane with forward motion X, treadmill with motion -X, wheels spinning at 2X, thrust applied to achieve speed X 2) a car with forward motion X, treadmill with motion -X, wheels spinning at 2X, thrust applied to achieve speed 2X Accelerate either the plane or the car with X from 0 to, say, 65. The plane will take off. The car will drive off the end of the treadmill. John T Thank you for your reply. Here is my .02, it would seem that the plane never actually moves in respect to the observer no matter how fast the treadmill moves, the plane will just take off like it is hovering and then slowly accelerate away? I guess I'll have to set this up and try it, I do have a few RC planes laying around and I have a treadmill so I guess I'll know one way or another, unless Mythbusters beats me to the punch. ------------------------------------------------------- DW DW, None of the people that believe the plane will fly say that it will fly with no forward motion. The claim is that the plane will accelerate to flying speed in spite of the treadmill moving in the opposite direction. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VQ-1's P4M-1Q crash off China - 1956 | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 6th 06 11:13 PM |
Passenger crash-lands plane after pilot suffers heart attack | R.L. | Piloting | 7 | May 7th 05 11:17 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | April 1st 04 08:27 AM |