![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Viperdoc wrote:
For example, the Extra 300 model is extremely poor. The acceleration is slower than the real aircraft, and the roll rate is much, much less than the full scale plane. Plus, I'm not pulling or pushing 8 g's or rolling at 400 degrees a second in the chair. Sims, even full motion ones, can not mimic the visceral cues found in real flight. Additionally, the visual cues looking at a computer monitor are not the same, since there is no peripheral vision input on the simple models such as MSFS. There are some advantages to multiple monitor systems with motion. Even without motion, having a full size cockpit with real instruments adds a lot to the realism (at least this was my experience at Simcomm). Sitting in front of a computer screen flying with a joystick, pedals, and throttle really don't come close to the actual experience of flying. It's not a Extra 300 but I had the opportunity years ago to "fly" the American Airlines Fokker F100 at their DFW training center at full motion. I thought that was pretty realistic for this general aviation pilot. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|