![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Make up your own mind Martin but this post from Brash (below) seems a
fair representation of the RAAfs attitude to their operational screw-ups and inadequacies. From such oafs right up to Air Marshal Errol McCormack, AO Chief of Air Force who reportedly told Kim at the time of the tragedy she would get a coronial inquest over his "dead body". Thoroughly consistent with the BOI whitewash and subsequent treatment of Kim and her kids. Most wouldn't know Shorty's background or the RAAFs treachery. He topped the class at the elite US Navy "Top Gun" test pilot school and four of his classmates are now NASA astronauts. Last year, his wife Dr Kim Short a RAAF reservist agreed to waive her right to an inquest. The RAAF agreed, in return, to settle her common law damages claim. "Subsequently they pulled the Air Accidents Act out of the hat and said I hadn't applied for compensation in the two-year period," she said. Under the Act, Squadron Leader Short would be regarded as a passenger, limiting the maximum payout available to his family to $200,000. Pack of *******s! .. On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 17:02:02 +1000, "Brash" wrote: "Vector" wrote in message news ![]() On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:20:22 +1000, Martin Taylor wrote: There's a lead in article in today's Herald-Sun newspaper regarding the widow of an F-111 pilot who was killed when his A/C crashed. It's about how the widow is being denied "adequate" compensation. Who here, who may have been in the RAAF, thinks that it's a fair article, or a beatup? Beatup? Wash your mouth out Martin - and don't expect anybody from the RAAF to respond to this shameful blot on their character.. And do not, repeat NOT you or anybody else ever question ir describe this bloody disgrace to todays ****weak organization of boy scouts which basks in the former glory of the RAAF as a beatup. Ain't it funny though that any number of these "boy scouts" could beat the living **** out of you. What a disgrace for you, that would be. Some could - most wouldn't. So what anyway - Wanna address the more important topic of RAAF treachery towards it's own dead? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
definition of "dual controls" | Lee Elson | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | April 24th 04 02:58 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |