![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's false about the assumptions? He's talking about flight at the same
angle of attack at different altitudes. Are you serous? First, take a look at his opening statement.We dont fly planes like this in real life.It seems he has made the deductions first, and then came up with the opening statement.Also, not all of these deductions can be true at the same time. The purpose of that section is not an operational guide. It's merely to illustrate a point -- that being the effect of flying at the same angle of attack at different altitudes. This leads to the last point: to do that you need more power. I don't see which one of the deductions isn't true given the parameters. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
#1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 03:04 AM |
Change in TAS with constant Power and increasing altitude. | Big John | Home Built | 6 | July 13th 03 03:29 PM |