![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 16, 4:58 pm, Newps wrote:
Kyle Boatright wrote: As a CFI I would not sign a guy off in a single for a BFR if I know his daily flying is a turbo twin. I have a friend with four super cubs, one on amphibs. A 182 with a canard on the nose, 310 hp and 26 bush wheels all around. A Spartan Executive. A Caravan and a 210 with a turbine in it. What should he do his BFR with? For the FAA or for safety? A review in each plane would not be a bad idea or at least take the 310 and the Spartan. This issue came up in some discussions from the FAA. The question was, should you do a BFR in a C-152 for a guy who only flies his Citation. Legally, you can. Personally, I would not. The BFR should be made to suit the type of flying the pilot does. I can't do Citation work in a C-150. -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Online Flight Review Course | john smith | Piloting | 1 | May 29th 06 02:02 AM |
Electronic review of flight? | Al | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | December 30th 05 09:51 PM |
Turbo performance vs non-turbo | John Doe | Owning | 22 | October 8th 05 02:34 AM |
Non-TW CFI cannot give Flight Review in TW | Hilton | Piloting | 12 | January 19th 04 10:31 PM |
Converting engine from Turbo to non-Turbo | Dick Kurtz | Home Built | 7 | October 31st 03 04:48 PM |