A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

annual interruptus



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old February 20th 07, 04:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,147
Default annual interruptus


"Denny" wrote in message
ups.com...

Well, for what it is worth, the local radio shop refuses to install,
work on, or sign off as airworthy, any radio that contains parts that
are not traceable to a part number approved by the holder of the type
certificate, KING in this case... King for it's part will not put
itself at legal risk by allowing deviation from their engineering
drawings - understandable when the get rich quick activities of the
trial bar are viewed...


What the hell did you not understand about Toecutter's post about "radio
parts is parts"?



The radio guy, Ron, is not a bad guy and I can understand his refusal
to put his license to make a living at risk... I get the same thing
all the time, people asking me to do something that is against either
some regulation or contrary what I know is considered acceptable... I
have to say NO also...


THere are tens of thousands of "radio guys" in this country. FInd one that
knows what the hell (s)he is doing.



As far as changing out the part, I am capable of that, though I do not
have a VOR signal generator to align it... Nor do I have a schematic,
nor alignment instructions... Taint as easy as it may seem since
adjustments may interact...


What do you not understand about VOTs, grasshopper?




I am currently waltzing with a low noise, +7dBm oscillator in the 10
megacycle


Now we've got an old fart who hasn't transitioned into Hertz yet...


range which is to be injected into a passive FET balanced
mixer,


and as stupid DS to boot that says that a FET balanced mixer is passive.
FETs are active. How the hell do you get into a passive FET?



'cept the ouput is not a clean sine wave, which means one half
of the mixer output will not be the same amplitude as the other half
- bad news - as those who play with mixers will understand... I need
to play with the windings ratio of the output transformer to see if
that cleans it up... Otherwise, the original author is 'all' wrong...



We play with mixers all the day long. You haven't a clue, bozo. Go peddle
your papers elsewhere.

Jim


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Out of annual.... A Lieberman Owning 7 October 31st 05 02:47 AM
After Annual ... [email protected] Piloting 22 August 18th 05 05:24 AM
My Annual Charles Talleyrand Owning 34 July 28th 05 01:17 PM
Off I go to help with my first annual on my C-150 NW_PILOT Owning 22 October 26th 04 11:39 PM
In for Annual Jim Weir Piloting 0 August 5th 04 07:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.