![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 6, 6:15 pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Jim writes: Excellent advice on all points. Only thing I would add is to use these steps in basic trainer such as C172 until proficient, as in real life you must crawl before you can walk. Flying a complex aircraft in simulation is task intensive and frustrating. Does a Baron 58 count as complex? It seems easy to fly compared to the big iron. It has retractable gear and variable pitch props, means it's complex. Not to mention multi-engine. I fly mostly the Baron 58 as Dreamfleet's simulation is rigorously accurate, so it behaves just like the real thing. The C172 seems too easy, so either this is the world's easiest plane to fly in real life, or the sim is not as accurate as it could be. In real life, I'd want to fly the same thing I had flown in the sim, if I could find a place that would give me instruction in a Baron (a new one, not one of those WWII relics, but without the G1000 junk). You would be very ill-advised to try and start your flight training in a twin. There's way too much stuff to cope with when you're trying to learn how to take off, fly s+l and land.. Best to learn on something small, slow, forgiving, and you can move up later. I found even going from a C152 to an Archer, I got way behind the aircraft - too much happening too fast, and the Archer doesn't have two engines, CSU's or retract. And the difference in cruise is only 35kt or so, but enough to get me seriously behind the aircraft!! Be careful not to float or balloon in ground effect. If you do balloon add a bit of power to stabilize and cut the throttle again and flare to landing. Hope this helps. I do seem to glide excessively just before touchdown. I have a phobia about expensive damage to the gear. I've hardly ever crashed in a way that would injure me in real life, but I've had a fair number of landings in which the gear was damaged (on one occasion I damaged flaps as well, not sure how). If you are floating you are going too fast or trying to hold it off too long. From reading your earlier post, you identified the VSo of the Baron as 75. My research came up with 69-72 as stall speeds. Which makes VSo x1.3 = 89-93kt. You probably don't want to be going for a full stall landing in a twin, so come in at about 90kt, raise the nose a bit to flare and let it settle onto the runway. Don't try and hold it off, that's what a Cessna pilot should do, but probably not a twin pilot. Just make sure your mains touch before your nose wheel. Mind you, I am not a twin pilot so that could all have been rubbish. :-) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ID Please - Throttle Quad | Orval Fairbairn | Restoration | 0 | December 17th 05 09:35 PM |
| Throttle movement | Max Richter | Naval Aviation | 12 | December 12th 04 12:09 AM |
| Engine throttle | Bob Ingraham | Simulators | 13 | December 11th 04 08:17 PM |
| Which throttle governer? | Garfiel | Rotorcraft | 1 | December 13th 03 05:30 PM |
| Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 06:20 AM |