![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
tedster wrote: Is the Hawk 128 good enough for training pilots for fly-by-wire aircraft (is that even an issue)? Yes. And avionics-wise it's not a 1970's aircraft any more. BAE is not entirely blameless. If the company intends to stay in the jet trainer business - and it should, given the widespread international acceptance of the Hawk - it must develop a more advanced version, with thin wings and afterburners for supersonic performance, making it an even better stepping stone to high-performance frontline aircraft. But the problem with that is that then it sort of _is_ a high-performance frontline aircraft -- and has a similar price tag both when you purchase it and when you fly it. -- Urban Fredriksson http://www.canit.se/%7Egriffon/ A weapon is a device for making your enemy change his mind. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kitty Hawk Bound -- Posters and Such | Jim Weir | Home Built | 2 | December 1st 03 04:56 AM |
Kitty Hawk Tickets? | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 7th 03 03:20 AM |
Hawk 200 questions | Kerry Ferrand | Military Aviation | 14 | July 31st 03 11:14 AM |
CUrtiss Hawk 75 performance debate | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 3 | July 16th 03 10:45 AM |
Arming Global Hawk Draws Conflicting Comments From Pentagon | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 5 | July 14th 03 08:51 PM |