![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Cox wrote: If you do manage to get out of a spinning aircraft, I wouls estimate close to a 100% better chance of survival if you have a chute on. I sure would hate to be the person who was able to get out of the so called "impossible aircraft to get out of" only to find they didn't have a chute on. Wear a chute, what can it hurt? Adam Adam Cope www.dcaerobatics.com 703-623-9445 I totally agree with this. The " you'll never get out of this airplane because of the door" routine is something I've heard repeated many times through my career teaching aerobatics. My standard answer and "lecture" on this issue is as follows; For spins, even if the regulations don't call for chutes, I always recommend wearing them. I always had chutes available for whatever aircraft we were using for spin training. A lot has been written and said about the difficulties involved in getting out of Aerobats, Citabrias, and Decathlons. There is no doubt that especially with a structural failure, exiting one of these aircraft could be iffy. That's why any good instructor not only supplies chutes for spin training, but as well performs a complete egress brief specific to aircraft type to the point where once the bail out call has been made, each occupant knows what the exit procedure will be. This is especially critical in tandem aircraft. I should mention that even with the most complete egress briefing, there is STILL an element of doubt that a successful exit from these airplanes can be executed in the time available under extreme g in a post structural failure. The factors involving a successful bail out are so diverse that there are just no guarantees. In the Pitts S2 for example, if the upper wing fails, the flying wires will most likely remain attached and the upper wing will beat the occupants to death before a bail out can be achieved. All this being considered, the use of chutes is not only recommended, but in my opinion a necessary part of every non- standard flight whether it be aerobatics or spin training. The bottom line is that wearing a chute gives you a fighting chance for survival. Not wearing a chute gives you no chance at all. Its a smart pilot who takes advantage of all available options! Dudley Henriques |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Tom Inglima | Piloting | 39 | December 21st 08 02:04 PM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Tom Inglima | Owning | 4 | March 1st 07 01:44 AM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Tom Inglima | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | March 1st 07 01:44 AM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 98 | June 18th 05 12:28 AM |
Rolling a Non Aerobat 150 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | April 29th 05 07:31 PM |