![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Whiteley wrote:
On May 3, 9:12 pm, Jack wrote: Frank Whiteley wrote: http://www.kilkennyadvertiser.ie/index.php?aid=5621 Would the Kilkenny pilot have been allowed to drive his automobile in his physical condition? Had he driven legally to the airfield from which he was flying? Could he have driven, legally or otherwise, into Dublin with all those around him unaware? Surely the Irish must rise up in arms and place all of those with heart problems under house-arrest, if such is the case! Do we now see those who are quite likely to be no harm to anyone but themselves as being the culprits rather than seeing the nanny-State, which presumes to decide for each and all of us what is best, as the real villain? How interesting that my spell-checker should have suggested the word "Valhalla" when it encountered "Mulhall". Jack I don't disagree that an individual in a personal glider accepts the risk, but that's definitely not the case here. I think the stated fact that he continued to flaunt the regs by flying power and the club's tow plane for four years after the expiration of his license and medical disqualification is telling. He was flight disqualified, period, and did not sign the required self-certification document. That part is worrying - I am pretty sure all of us have had at least one flight where we realised that we were not really fit to fly no matter what our medical certificate said. I know I have. But this is different - It looks like he consciously elected to disregard the rules and four years of illegal power flying is cause for concern. This was clearly not a momentaty oversight, on his part, or on the management where he flew. The fact that he died in the glider drew significant attention. He might have died in the pub later that night, in bed, or on the road, and that would not have drawn this review. Re-read the last paragraph. The tone is ominous, yet it has been shown over the years that a flight medical is not a reliable predictor of whether a pilot will succumb at the controls. What it shows is that the club committee or board did not take due diligence in it's obligations to the members and the greater soaring community to ensure that those entrusted instructional and towing duties were, in fact, qualified. The point is, whether some of them knew, or suspected, they clearly were not auditing the situation. It's a relatively simple matter to do so. The important fact is that the individual put all of the members at risk, if not in personal terms (instruction and towing), at the very least in financial terms. It was a club glider after all. Maybe the club was too short of members to be viable without him. Maybe he was so dominant as the incumbent CFI that no checks were made on him. People assume that previous behaviour will continue - so probably no-one presumed to check up on the CFI. Now it appears that entire national organization is is pressured to jump through hoops due to the arrogance, and lack of personal integrity, of one, and the negligence of a few. This is sadly very true. While it is trite to say, the nanny state will make the lives of those who follow the rules harder, while making very little difference to those who for whatever reason have decided to ignore them. We have the requirement to have and carry a valid license, with your ratings and medical and flight review dates on it. This gets posted anually to the clubs safety officer. (in our club thats me) Safety officer has job of keeping an eye on who is due for renewal. Duty instructor is expected to make occasional checks and enforce the rules. Expired anything means loss of solo flying privileges. The associated assumption of responsibility is one factor in the increasing difficulty we experience in getting people to fill the leadership roles such as CFI, or Safety Officer or Club Exco. As a self empoloyed person, the reward I can expect for my voluntary and unremunerated work is that the time and cost involved in a legal case involving an incident at my club could bankrupt me. Bruce |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Making your own canopy | c hinds | Home Built | 6 | November 22nd 04 09:10 AM |
How to deal with a difficult DE? | Mark | Piloting | 15 | August 19th 04 12:21 AM |
Difficult Strips | C J Campbell | Piloting | 6 | August 11th 04 08:04 PM |
Making a VFR C152 IFR | Paul Folbrecht | Instrument Flight Rules | 48 | April 7th 04 04:39 PM |
Strange and/or really difficult approaches | SeeAndAvoid | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | February 24th 04 03:25 AM |