A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Weather vs. Combat



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #29  
Old August 30th 03, 04:09 AM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Weather vs. Combat
From: "PosterBoy"
Date: 8/29/03 7:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Weather vs. Combat
From: "PosterBoy"

Date: 8/29/03 6:04 PM Pacific


(ILS REMAINS UNCHANGED)
More than one type of ILS system was tried. The system eventually adopted
consisted of a course indicator (called a localizer) that showed whether

the
plane was to the left or right of the runway centerline, a glide path or
landing beam to show if the plane was above or below the glide slope, and
two marker beacons for showing the progress of approach to the landing
field. Equipment in the airplane allowed the pilot to receive the
information that was sent so he could keep the craft on a perfect flight
path to visual contact with the runway. Approach lighting and other
visibility equipment are part of the ILS and also aid the pilot in

landing.
In 2001, the ILS remains basically unchanged.

(NINE LOCATIONS BY 1945, TEN UNDERWAY)
By 1945, nine CAA systems were operating and 10 additional locations were
under construction.

(ARMY INSTALLING 50)
Another 50 were being installed for the army. On January 15, 1945, the

U.S.
Army introduced an ILS with a higher frequency transmitter to reduce

static
and create straighter courses, called the Army Air Forces Instrument
Approach System Signal Set 51. In 1949, the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) adopted this army standard for all member countries.

In
the 1960s, the first ILS equipment for fully blind landings became

possible.

Cheers.




Here's the way we did it when flying out of Stansted England before D-Day.

.
You would taxi out to the head of the runway. If you could see the end of

the
runway you went. If you couldn't see the end of the runway you went

anyway.

Believe it, Art!!
Same-same K-2 in Korea, 'cept it was mainly haze from the breakfast kimchi
pots in the nearby village of Taegu!
And, I'm sure that the air conditioning system...which could and did blow
frost all around the '86 cockpit...made waiting for the haze to clear a bit
more pleasant than in the Maurader.

Cheers.



Our weather officer, Paul Forant (Boston) couldn't sleep nights and had a
recurring nightmare. He would dream he had the entire 344th in the air coming
back from a mission, low on fuel with wounded aboard with no place to bring us
down.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Learning more about weather Matt Young Instrument Flight Rules 9 December 23rd 04 01:34 PM
Part 135 Question - Weather Reporting requirement G Farris Instrument Flight Rules 5 October 21st 04 11:05 PM
Cockpit weather display question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 6 July 21st 04 01:07 PM
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING The Ink Company Aviation Marketplace 0 November 5th 03 12:07 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.