![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Hirose" wrote
When a Doppler ground mapping technique is being employed the direction of your line of sight matters a lot. The difference in Doppler between targets A and B is very small. On the other hand, C and D are in the position of max Doppler difference and are much easier for the radar to resolve. The size of this difference is not the only factor involved, but it's very important. -- A B C D Targets C and D are known as "tangential targets." That is, their Doppler is getting close to zero. The benefit of SAR is not really in the Doppler. It is in the long look at the target. Targets straight ahead would be like looking off the side of your parabolic antenna. What you want is a parabolic antenna that is 5 miles wide: --------- C D Now you can crunch the target data and simulate say an effective 1 degree beam with a physical 3 degree beam (which at 5 miles can cover a whole city block, while a 1 degree beam can focus on buildings). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IFR Flight Plan question | Snowbird | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | August 13th 04 12:55 AM |
Yet another "Radar Required" question. | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | April 27th 04 05:07 PM |
Ham sandwich navigation and radar failure | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | December 31st 03 12:15 AM |
Vietnam era F-4s Q | Ed Rasimus | Military Aviation | 87 | September 27th 03 03:59 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |