![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In article . net, meport wrote: There was a segment about the F-111 and it's "introduction" into combat. It seems that there were two very serious design flaws with the plane - the movable wings would not move fast enough at low speeds, the speeds the airplane needed to be at for low level operations, if they had to be moved so the plane could accelerate out of danger if it started taking a lot of ground fire and the avionics were not sophisticated enough to handle all weather ground hugging flight in a tropical climate. Whatever are you talking about?? Low speeds for low level operations?? Howabout lugging a "slant eight" load of CBU 58s or Mk 82s at 540K/200AGL. And, at that speed, the wings would probably be at 54 anyway. Accelerate outta danger?? They were already at "the speed of heat" on the way in, and faster yet on the way out, perhaps with the wings at 72, if needed. The TFR worked fine except for isolated areas of intense rainfall, and I stress "intense." It was also suspected that later on, the Gomers were experimenting with highly directional electronic countermeasures against the TFR. The initial Harvest Reaper crashes were, apparently, due to a suspect weld in a relatively small rod in the slab power actuator assembly. When the rods were redesigned, the crashes stopped, and the A-model Vark went on to a distinguished career in SEA, especially during Linebacker II. Phil Brandt F-111A WSO (Ret.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|