![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder wrote:
Matt Whiting wrote: Ken Reed wrote: NJAS3068 1966 CESSNA 210F Insured Value $70,000 Premium for Aircraft NJAS3068 is $3,785.00 That's a major reason I didn't buy a turbo 210 I looked at a few years ago. Insurance on any 210 was outrageous, according to my broker. I'm paying less of a yearly premium than quoted above, have 1MM smooth, an airframe that's 25 years newer and a hull value almost four times that quoted above. This for my Mooney Bravo. Any idea of why the difference is so dramatic? I thought the 210 had a decent accident rate. I'll probably end up with a 182 again as that way I have the required 50 hours in type. Matt 6 vs 4 seats at least on the later models. Ah, yes, I forgot that Mooney is a 4 seater. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Would ~ 500 planes depress the U.S. used aircraft market? | OtisWinslow | General Aviation | 0 | August 25th 05 09:42 PM |
Would ~ 500 planes depress the U.S. used aircraft market? | OtisWinslow | Owning | 0 | August 25th 05 09:42 PM |
Would ~ 500 planes depress the U.S. used aircraft market? | [email protected] | Owning | 15 | August 24th 05 09:40 PM |
Would ~ 500 planes depress the U.S. used aircraft market? | Dave S | General Aviation | 11 | August 24th 05 12:19 PM |
Would ~ 500 planes depress the U.S. used aircraft market? | Dave S | Owning | 0 | August 23rd 05 03:02 AM |