![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce" wrote in message ... Bill Daniels wrote: This comment is solely about trainer L/D and not this specific trainer. L/D IS important especially if you operate from a field where nearby landings are hazardous. Students ( and for that matter some instructors) aren't good at judging just how far they can glide. In this situation, extra performance is what gets them home after a mis-judgement. L/D then becomes a safety factor. There's no downside to training in higher performance unless the instructor THINKS there is. If the instructor is afraid of high performance gliders, he will pass that fear on to his students. Bill Daniels wrote in message ups.com... for a trainer 40:1 is plenty. heck 18:1 is plenty, as proven by the multitudes of pilots trained in 2-22 and 2-33 Schweizers over the years. We're not talking about an open class nationals competitor here. I agree conditionally. This is one area where the old crates make better trainers, as the difference in effective glide ratio is much more affected by wind. The safe circuit differs markedly with a 1:26 L/D and a wind component that can be a significant fraction of stall speed. So it is easier to teach the mental calculations required, and when to draw the line in terms of the - Is it safe to launch? decision. How so? A 2-33 stalls (really) at about 40 MPH. My Nimbus 2C stalls at 38mph and I can turn inside a 1-26 if the ballast tanks are dry. If I open the dive brakes to the point they want to rest, the Nimbus 2C glides about like a 2-22. If I open them all the way it's 1:1 at 55mph. A higher penetration , higher performance trainer makes the distances involved a little bigger, so they may be harder to judge. In this instance I believe higher performance may lower safety. Yes harder, but the errors will be on the safe side - i.e. the HP glider will go farther than the student is willing to believe. The downside of training exclusively in low performance gliders is that transition to even a moderate performance single seater is more difficult. You bet! And once you have created the mind set that higher performance glider are difficult to fly - they WILL be more difficult to fly for that student. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
the Oz 3 surface trainer | patrick mitchel | Home Built | 2 | May 15th 07 03:19 AM |
WTB Trainer | Roy Bourgeois | Soaring | 0 | June 25th 06 04:50 PM |
***XC-Trainer Offer*** | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | August 24th 05 05:21 PM |
AMD Alarus IFR Trainer | H.P. | Owning | 0 | August 5th 04 07:10 PM |
AMD Alarus IFR Trainer | H.P. | Piloting | 0 | August 5th 04 07:10 PM |