|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
July 10th 07, 05:41 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
Stupid Pilot Tricks
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:46:09 -0000, Jim Logajan wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: Are ultralights only subject to FAA Part 103, or must ultralight pilots meet Part 91 regulations also? Yes and no, respectively. So, if it was a Part 103 ultralight, Part 91 is not applicable rendering the sheriff's mention of remaining 500' from persons and structures incorrect, no? If all parts of Part 103.1 "Applicability" (including the "intended" part of 103.1(a) regarding single occupant) were satisfied, then it is my understanding that no aspect of Part 91 is applicable. But there is always 103.9(a) "Hazardous operations", which is rather subjective. Then I suspect it's a matter of the facts of the case and the persuasiveness of the arguments the opposing lawyers make to the judge. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stupid Pilot Tricks? | Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe | Rotorcraft | 2 | May 8th 07 04:00 AM |
| Stupid Pilot Tricks - Insurance Co. Trying to Back Out | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 54 | October 8th 04 10:15 AM |
| Stupid pilot tricks | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 20 | September 18th 04 06:44 PM |
| More Stupid Govenment Tricks | john smith | Piloting | 8 | September 2nd 04 04:35 AM |
| Stupid Pilot Tricks | David Dyer-Bennet | Piloting | 3 | October 19th 03 12:22 AM |
Threaded Mode