![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 3, 6:27 pm, " wrote:
It's up to the A&P to decide if the modification is a major or minor modification. I thought that was the way it is supposed to work too, as reading the regs seems to overtly state this. But in actual practice the A&P is now being basically required to seek permission from above whether he can declare something to be minor or not... that he is expected to assume everything is major unless the FSDO grants him permission to declare it minor after they review the details themselves. If they bounced back 337's that were minor alterations, it would help everyone out. I thought they were supposed to do exactly just that too -- to "decline" the 337 with a note stating that the job is minor and to log it as such. But that's not what's been happening in real life. Good luck Thanks, I'll probably need it, but my IA did say that the 337 for the PSE intercom should slide right thru the bureaucracy like greased butter since a TSO'd part is already an approved part and its installation manual also constitutes "approved data" for the 337 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Good, the Bad, the Ugly: AirGizmo PIREP, PS Engineering CD/Intercom woes, XM "service" | Jay Honeck | Owning | 34 | December 15th 06 03:02 AM |
Garmin 496-XM Radio-PS Engineering Intercom Follow up... | Jay Honeck | Owning | 25 | December 9th 06 12:26 PM |
PS Engineering | blanche cohen | Owning | 3 | January 17th 04 12:08 AM |
PS Engineering | Hankal | Owning | 0 | December 5th 03 12:25 AM |